
Originally Posted by
sexual harassment panda
What I'm saying is that top kingdoms have taken ages off after being annoyed at the whore tier to war in the war tier and they end up winning pretty easily vs the best warring kingdoms. This happened with giraffes a few ages ago in recent memory. I'm sure there's other examples like when emeriti decided not to bother competing a few ages before that.
There's just about no examples of the reverse happening without the warring kingdoms adding better players/leaders and morphing into a whoring kingdom over a process of a few ages.
Whoring kingdoms still have to be able to war, and they have to be able to do it at a better level than you do because the margin for error is much smaller.
I don't get what the hell the second part of your post has anything to do with the first part or even what you were responding to. As to wsk/div both have experienced whores in their core or ls. It's hard to bring them up as an example of a warring kingdom that went to the top and hung with the best. Even if that's your claim, I'm not really sure who either beat last age that you could point to them out-warring whore kingdoms. Div refused a fight where they were 20k acres ahead of BB because BB outprepped them so hard.