Originally Posted by
Elldallan
As I shall soon demonstrate none of this is anything new.
It's always been that way, this is nothing new, I can point to several similar events, at least one including Rage. So yeah, nothing to see here move along.
This was already established last age when AMA hit into PewPew vs Debauchery, nothing to see here move along.
That's just a subsection of the previously established rule that Havoc established a few ages ago that it's ok to hit into a conflict if you noticed. And it was reconfirmed again last age by SWE A when they hit into PewPew vs I forgot who.Nothing new here, move along
See #2 and #3, it's already an established precedent, move along.
Thats just an addendum to the previously established precedent that when threatened by the domineering alliance(in that case Abs) farmout or resetting is the correct action. Which in itself is merely adding a third option "Get creative" to a previously established precedent that when threatened by an alliance either submit or get gb'ed. Exception: if you have an alliance of your own, start an alliance war. Nothing new to see here, move along.
Merely the logical extension of the precedent that it's ok to hit into an active conflict set by Havoc, also see #2, #3, #4 so merely a variation of something already established
That's just a variation of a precedent set by Bishop that certain arranged wars are indeed fake wars, nothing new here move along.
Also, as a previous member of Abs, gg hypocrite, your alliance already established a lot of the points you tried to make.