AMA & BB ruin the game

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

09-05-2014, 23:29
Crunch

Quote:

Originally Posted by munk

will people please respect that it is Eurovision Song Contest in Copenhagen today... thank you.

i understand you cr guys like austria
09-05-2014, 23:32
BungArm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palem

http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Sne...7bf_184775.png

amg !!
sneak hugs !

SURPRISE !!
09-05-2014, 23:59
Crazy Pete

I'm not to sure what will become of this age, if AMA will war BB. If it does happen win or loose I think it would be a great war to be involved in to test our selves vs a very skilled opponent. I think BB is one of the 2 best kingdoms in the game, CR being a close 3rd. Any of those 3 kingdoms warring is going to be worth watching.

All 3 kingdoms have very different set ups which makes any of those wars unpredictable. Just goes to show the range of kingdom set ups that can be run and be effective.
10-05-2014, 03:49
Elit

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maximouse

How that is not different from the 2 self proclaimed strongest kd's in the game having a pact against the 3rd kd, and those 2 kd's actualy timing notices and waves so that they help eachother against everybody else near them (sure, there isnt any coordination. Its just pure luck the timing is soo good, right?) is beyond me.

AMA and BB are "ally" long before you are "born" so don't feel special its pact against you. AMA was giving your KD easy CF every age for keep run in top more balanced till you killed your relations with AMA. Don't blame AMA/BB for you being stupid.
About "self proclaiming best kds" its what ppl say from long for us. Maybe we earned people respect for tell it? If you think here is better KD from AMA/BB you can share you view and name this kd.
10-05-2014, 03:56
Band of Horses

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elit

AMA and BB are "ally" long before you are "born" so don't feel special its pact against you. AMA was giving your KD easy CF every age for keep run in top more balanced till you killed your relations with AMA. Don't blame AMA/BB for you being stupid.
About "self proclaiming best kds" its what ppl say from long for us. Maybe we earned people respect for tell it? If you think here is better KD from AMA/BB you can share you view and name this kd.

Are you inferring that Maximouse wasn't really born? Are you his father?

Best kd is hands down A Mother's Blood.
10-05-2014, 07:36
John Snowstorm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Band of Horses

Are you inferring that Maximouse wasn't really born? Are you his father?

Best kd is hands down A Mother's Blood.

Despair thy charm, and let the angel whome thou hast served tell thee,
Maximoose was from his mothers womb untimely ripped
10-05-2014, 12:34
StratOcastle

I voted no because you need the Yankees and Darth Vader. I don't like baseball or the syrupy crap in Star Wars so this was hard for me.
10-05-2014, 13:59
Proteus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maximouse

I think I said something like, neither of you was worth responding to due to the amount of false facts and bs that came along with both your posts. But unlike you, proteus atleast understands how the game works (to some degree).
Your just a pissed of ghetto player that didnt like his monarch sticking up for his KD instead of for you. You played solo in a teamgame, payed the price for that, and are butthurt ever since. Doesnt matter if I create world war 3 or bring world peace. You will hate anything I do or say just cause its me doing it or saying it. No point in agrueing with you as a result of that.

I always found it funny when players not on my level who do not lead their own kds and just join a council of 4+ people (such as maxi in sanc and havoc) pretend to be worth anything, keep milking it little man.

Just because you pretend to have "good" diplo does not automatically make your posts correct, you have yet to explain why 3/4 of your kds ages you did not even end up in t5 and lost wars to ama/bb, what are you basing your kds skill on, 1 crown? Lots of kds have one crown only, and the age following it you were embarrassed so it was pretty much a fluke. The age prior to it you were embarrassed too when bb owned you in b2b fights. And the funny thing you weren't even the main leader when you won it, there are like 7 of you, so you really have nothing to say.
10-05-2014, 14:05
Proteus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maximouse

Sorry protector, your misinformed yet again. We are friendly with rbl indeed. But CF with pew2 only came after they approached us for it, which was after our 2 wars I think and during our hostiles that emidiately followed those wars. It was around the same time we asked bb and ama if CF's were an option or not.

Last age we had 0 allies or friends. We just played the age pretty oldschool whoring style. CF all that might pose a threat early on. Let everybody fight eachother and whore away and pump. We did that without allies. Without coordinating with anybody. Without making a pact with anybody to block any KD. And unlike the conspiracy theory claims, without multies or whatever crap got posted by elit and others.

How that is not different from the 2 self proclaimed strongest kd's in the game having a pact against the 3rd kd, and those 2 kd's actualy timing notices and waves so that they help eachother against everybody else near them (sure, there isnt any coordination. Its just pure luck the timing is soo good, right?) is beyond me.

Is AMA ruining the game? No
Is BB ruining the game? No

Their refusal to fight eachother and the amount of coordinated actions against clearly weaker opponents is though. And its a shame neither KD can see that. But its not really ruining the game I guess. Its just effecting the topplay.

Last age there was a coordinated alliance of RPP that put AMA through the ringer of B2B wars, BB wasnt in crown race since early age, we were playing 1vs4, thats the difference. Although you were not formally in an "alliance" you benefitted from a de facto nap for 10 weeks with 3 of those kds. 2 kds having friendly relations does a lot less harm to the game than 3 kingdoms being allied and coordinating to one kingdom. This age you had your failed FPP butt busy fake-rage who mirrored you perfectly and you both decided to cheat and abuse game mechanics and ultimately were ***** slapped by bishop.

Also why is PS's post bs, every time someone questions your inflated self worth based on performance you call it bs, it's based on charts.

Age 58 your kd finished outside of t10 and lost war to ama
Age 59 your kd lost b2b fights war to bb and finished #7
Age 60 won
Age 61 wont win, probably wont finish t3 (we can see later).

How are these results consistent/good? Are these "top kd" results? Being a top kd is all about consistent performance in charts and war vs other top kds, its not about hitting a home run one age after having mediocre performance in others. Right now the game is even smaller making it easier it to be t3 consistently.

So whats up?
10-05-2014, 15:52
Band of Horses

Can I vote Pew Pew ruins the game?
10-05-2014, 16:13
Elit

Quote:

Originally Posted by Band of Horses

Can I vote Pew Pew ruins the game?

No, its going to bring drama!
Lets keep it black and white :)
10-05-2014, 16:21
Band of Horses

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elit

No, its going to bring drama!
Lets keep it black and white :)

But they are bullying me! It is black and white!
10-05-2014, 17:06
PhoenixScorpion

Quote:

Originally Posted by Proteus

Last age there was a coordinated alliance of RPP that put AMA through the ringer of B2B wars, BB wasnt in crown race since early age, we were playing 1vs4, thats the difference. Although you were not formally in an "alliance" you benefitted from a de facto nap for 10 weeks with 3 of those kds. 2 kds having friendly relations does a lot less harm to the game than 3 kingdoms being allied and coordinating to one kingdom. This age you had your failed FPP butt busy fake-rage who mirrored you perfectly and you both decided to cheat and abuse game mechanics and ultimately were ***** slapped by bishop.

Also why is PS's post bs, every time someone questions your inflated self worth based on performance you call it bs, it's based on charts.

Age 58 your kd finished outside of t10 and lost war to ama
Age 59 your kd lost b2b fights war to bb and finished #7
Age 60 won
Age 61 wont win, probably wont finish t3 (we can see later).

How are these results consistent/good? Are these "top kd" results? Being a top kd is all about consistent performance in charts and war vs other top kds, its not about hitting a home run one age after having mediocre performance in others. Right now the game is even smaller making it easier it to be t3 consistently.

So whats up?

+1. It is not even personal. People always think it is personal. I am still of the position that while there are still good KD's in the game the thing known as a SuperKD is long dead. Bragging now is more like tongue in cheek humor. If you have no consistency in todays landscape then bragging is just humorous. Facts are facts, you cant spin them and opinions dont matter.
10-05-2014, 17:35
flogger

Irony: CR people complaining about AMA and BB friendship which started from CR people playing in BB.
10-05-2014, 17:48
Proteus

Quote:

Originally Posted by flogger

Irony: CR people complaining about AMA and BB friendship which started from CR people playing in BB.

CR ans RBL seems much tighter than AMA and BB do. Last age RBL jumped on the GB bangwagon and recruited other kds to the effort and was one of the biggest propents of "do what we say or 25 green" while everyone else was ready to CF/back out. This follows an age where CR basically let RBL get dealbroken out of top and RBL point blank refused to help out yet drixx was bending himself backwards to help cr out, this age he was rewarded by heads up about mechanic exploitation to aid cows and CR even did diplo for his kd.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page