AMA & BB ruin the game

[Proteus]

Sorry protector, your misinformed yet again. We are friendly with rbl indeed. But CF with pew2 only came after they approached us for it, which was after our 2 wars I think and during our hostiles that emidiately followed those wars. It was around the same time we asked bb and ama if CF's were an option or not.

Last age we had 0 allies or friends. We just played the age pretty oldschool whoring style. CF all that might pose a threat early on. Let everybody fight eachother and whore away and pump. We did that without allies. Without coordinating with anybody. Without making a pact with anybody to block any KD. And unlike the conspiracy theory claims, without multies or whatever crap got posted by elit and others.

How that is not different from the 2 self proclaimed strongest kd's in the game having a pact against the 3rd kd, and those 2 kd's actualy timing notices and waves so that they help eachother against everybody else near them (sure, there isnt any coordination. Its just pure luck the timing is soo good, right?) is beyond me.

Is AMA ruining the game? No
Is BB ruining the game? No

Their refusal to fight eachother and the amount of coordinated actions against clearly weaker opponents is though. And its a shame neither KD can see that. But its not really ruining the game I guess. Its just effecting the topplay.

Last age there was a coordinated alliance of RPP that put AMA through the ringer of B2B wars, BB wasnt in crown race since early age, we were playing 1vs4, thats the difference. Although you were not formally in an "alliance" you benefitted from a de facto nap for 10 weeks with 3 of those kds. 2 kds having friendly relations does a lot less harm to the game than 3 kingdoms being allied and coordinating to one kingdom. This age you had your failed FPP butt busy fake-rage who mirrored you perfectly and you both decided to cheat and abuse game mechanics and ultimately were ***** slapped by bishop.

Also why is PS's post bs, every time someone questions your inflated self worth based on performance you call it bs, it's based on charts.

Age 58 your kd finished outside of t10 and lost war to ama
Age 59 your kd lost b2b fights war to bb and finished #7
Age 60 won
Age 61 wont win, probably wont finish t3 (we can see later).

How are these results consistent/good? Are these "top kd" results? Being a top kd is all about consistent performance in charts and war vs other top kds, its not about hitting a home run one age after having mediocre performance in others. Right now the game is even smaller making it easier it to be t3 consistently.

So whats up?