A Resolution: On Ethics and Top Play

[Elldallan]

"Abs threatened AMA with gb if they accepted a farmout from PewPew, so if they had it would have been the exact same situation as this, so yes they did."

There is a difference between two kingdoms agreeing one of them farmout to the other and the current situation. You are smart enough to understand this.

From what I heard AMA wasn't involved in it at all, PewPew threatened to farm out to AMA so Abs told AMA if they farm Pew/let Pew farm there would be gb, there was never any implied agreement from the sources I've heard. But yes an agreed farmout would obviously be different, on the other hand it is practically impossible to know wether it was agreed on or if the farmout merely decided to stop fighting in the war.

"Abs also threatened to Gb Dreams unless they kicked about half the kingdom and did in fact proceed to gb Dreams for refusing, so yes they've threatened to gb kingdoms unless they keeled over and died."

Those people declared an alliance war on Absalom , then after a few weeks, they deleted and quit the game. No surrender, no deal was worked out, you really think they would be allowed to form a new kingdom and come back without consequences?

Yes I never said it might not have been warranted, I just stated that yes Abs has been known for demanding that kd's keel over and die or face gb, personally I think that forcefully removing RBL's acres if they had refused to take themselves out of the fight would have been warranted.

What would you have preferred happen anri ??

Since farming out is a Simians specialty I'm sure that Anri is very upset that people took a stance against it since that implies that Simians may be prevented from being Simians in future ages, should they ever stop ghettobashing and try for the charts again that is.