Quote Originally Posted by Korp View Post
Thats just stupid, if one part of the conflict its not avaiable its no longer an active hostile situation.
If conflict started before the war started then there still is a conflict because running shouldn't be an acceptable end of conflict if the running party actually had a reasonable chance to end the conflict which jerks totally did according to what Elit claims he offered and it's been acknowledged by Tetley that that deal was actually offered. Running is just stupid and shouldn't be seen as the end of a conflict unless the running party were never given any chance to take a reasonable way out, Jerks were given a ridiculously cheap way out so until both parties can agree to a deal the conflict should still be considered to be ongoing.

Jerks refused a reasonable deal so they lost any right to suddenly decide that conflict is over.