I just wanted to say "LOL".i just want everyone who reads this to know that i love you and jesus loves you no matter what you believe, and no matter how you act, you will be forgiven in the eyes of the lord if you repent and try to make things better. we are mortals and we make mistakes. our father in heaven understands this and he is a kind god. that is what i believe
I think what Stoffi was trying to illustrate is that there is a big difference between the actions of Hamas (rockets) and Israel. The response is very disproportionate, in terms of civilian casualties and terror I think that Israel's actions are the worst act of terrorism.It's too bad that Hamas Kills people and not only beats them up.
It could be because the west bank isn't under siege and being starved.Then you have to ask, how is it that the West Bank, another area ceded to palestinian control by Israel, ISN'T shooting rockets at civilians targets in Israel?
Edit:
Forgot to ask about this, exactly where in "international law" is this stated? It sounds to me like something made up to lessen the burden that civilian casualties has on the inventor's mind.They are not only hiding inside civilian population, they operate from withing the population (for example, they launch rockets from schools). According to international law, the responsibility for civilian deaths is theirs, because of this.
If you strike a target knowing that there's a risk/certitude that civilians will be killed you decide that striking the target is worth the civilian casualties. Using a reasoning that says that civilian deaths aren't the responsibility of the one who actually does the aggression against them would mean that you could nuke gaza and still claim that it was hamas's fault...




					
					
					
						
  Reply With Quote