Simians Vs Sanc, HoH or Rage

[Mal]

Situation is same. How you define "legitimately fighting"? When Rage have advantage they can decide who have "right" to fight with them but when Simians are in disadvantage they dont have right to pick his target? How many hits did Simians in return Sanc for hit cow and dragons? How many sing they gave for plan to "legitimately fighting" with sanc to make sanc wave them after send his army out?
Yes maybe you are right..its not same situation. Bio didn't double hostile rage but sanctuary double Simians.

A legitimate fight involves not abusing game mechanics to avoid giving a button. If BiO had given Rage a button followed by Rage ignoring them THAT would be close to an analogous situation.

Simians noticed Sanctuary causing them to train up, Sanctuary started the conflict with a cow hit and dragon and told them not to hit anyone else. It is so far apart in this case its absurd. You spew propaganda.

And no, to answer your question, you have no right to run from a kingdom who you noticed once they have begun the conflict. "The rules" are more like guidelines, they are constantly massaged/broken, Simians tried to treat them as absolute and game them. As I mentioned earlier in the thread Ghettocats is being gangbanged over less, all Simians had to do was fight Sanctuary and there would have been no double hostile (they were well informed what would happen). The situation with Rage was totally different because you actively sought out a gangbang against them, intention matters too. No one in HoH intended to fight Simians until they were waved, no one in Sanctuary intended to double hostile.