Quote Originally Posted by tak3shi View Post
Going by that reasoning if Havoc double hostiled AMA, pew2 double hostiled Sanc. If you considered Sanc vs AMA to be a 1v1 situation but Havoc noticed AMA before AMA waved Sanc and Pew2 noticed Sanc before AMA waved Sanc.

When you were doubled it was clear cut can you consider this clear cut? If stealing is a hostile action you must have doubled, tripled, quadrapled hostile tons of kd's.
Someone, I think jamin, made an excellent definition of hostility - when it states hostile on kd page. In this case AMA's kd page read "Hostile" when Sanc viewed it and vice versa. Ergo, they were hostile. When hits started from another kd into that hostile, that is double hostile. Stop trying to complicate things.