Quote Originally Posted by Farore View Post
Not by itself, but I'm pretty sure he meant the general idea of playing aggressively, warring and winning said wars and using those war wins to advance to the top instead of what appears to be the usual status quo. I don't agree with everything the Dealbreakers have done, but I do kind of respect them a little more for that. Even though it's apparently not how most of the top 10 does things, it's a lot more challenging to win wars with sizeable opponents than to cease-fire almost everyone who's a threat and farm ghettos and science pump to climb the ranks.
they chose themselves to play by the rules of the top by agreeing to cf deals etc., they also chose to break their word themselves.. winning wars via backstabbing is not more challanging than beating any moderate warring kd or respectable by any bit..