Quote Originally Posted by Sig View Post
No. We were going for WW's, not land. The only age we ever went for land was last age.

Also, check the records, we only needed 7 wins to secure crown, that war was for win 8. It is also why you removed ALL 8 WINS because you are BIAS and didnt want us to win the crown by only removing 1 war, 7 would have sufficed.

This is how I know you know you are wrong now. Thanks.
Yes, you were going for war wins which is why you traded your acres for a war win - this is win trading. All kds that wintraded or fixed wars for war win crown got their wins reset. Bias would be if you were treated differently to those other kingdoms, you weren't

Quote Originally Posted by Araqiel View Post
The developers said the war was fake, punished Pew pew, but rewarded you with an eowcf. How is that so hard to understand?
SWEA were allowed a partial eowcf, you'd rather they were dumped out of war so you can vulture them. That would be as unfair as allowing them a 4 day eowcf.

Quote Originally Posted by Araqiel View Post
Win traded?

One kingdom let the other win intentionally by not fighting back. Same **** as SWEA / Pew.

At least Debauchery TRIED to make the war look legit.
SWEA/PP weren't going for ww crown :/