Age 66 potental changes

[Wilmington]

I didn't read every post, so forgive me if I missed something, but is there a difference between battle gains and attack gains? Seems to me that battle gains would include defensive battles which would imply that attacks against them are also -20%. Then again, that really doesn't sound like much of a negative so...

[tiggis]

I didn't read every post, so forgive me if I missed something, but is there a difference between battle gains and attack gains? Seems to me that battle gains would include defensive battles which would imply that attacks against them are also -20%. Then again, that really doesn't sound like much of a negative so...

Only on attacks they make.

[Avenger]

Avian slight buff, Elf big buff. Both were pretty good already. Dwarf still pretty ****ty.

ospec bonuses need to be racial. i don't like WH the way it is currently, Dragon Immunity is a bonus that shouldn't be in the game period.

Yeah, no.

[StratOcastle]

Irc failed me

Is cj cool?

CJ is the breeze.

[noobium]

Can Bishop give a final confirmation on what "-20% battle gains" exactly means? Does that mean less kills, less honor, less credits, or just reduced land/resource gains? Dunno if it was already mentioned in this thread.

[Wilmington]

So if there is no difference between attack gains and battle gains, why not just call them both the same? Another thing that is confusing is the Elf and Halfer bonuses. This time it says spell and thievery operation success with wpa and tpa in parenthesis whereas this age it just says wpa and tpa. That makes me think that it only works on offensive operations now. I know it may sound a little nit-picky, but that would be pretty huge.

[khronosschoty]

So if there is no difference between attack gains and battle gains, why not just call them both the same? Another thing that is confusing is the Elf and Halfer bonuses. This time it says spell and thievery operation success with wpa and tpa in parenthesis whereas this age it just says wpa and tpa. That makes me think that it only works on offensive operations now. I know it may sound a little nit-picky, but that would be pretty huge.

about the WPA and the TPA I agree; I've been asking the same question.

[Wilmington]

Lol, that would create a whole new aspect for wars with T/M vs T/M battles. Well, maybe not new, but certainly enough of it to make it require more attention.

[Malficient]

Lol, that would create a whole new aspect for wars with T/M vs T/M battles. Well, maybe not new, but certainly enough of it to make it require more attention.

I believe that was the intention. So that t/ms could op t/ms with better success. Makes faerys a lot weaker. But in the post in uto talk bishop does say its the same bonus. I don't understand why you would change the wording though.

[Wilmington]

Actually, it makes Elves and Halfers a lot weaker because they are the ones with that bonus now. It really makes faeries stronger because they can now op Halfers and cast on Elves for more damage. It's going to get real nasty if that is the case.

[Bishop]

The bonuses are the same as they have always been. Not sure why anyone thinks I'd sneak in a significant change and then hide it from everyone. The name changes are simply to align the ingame race and personality list, which takes its info from the game code, with what we have traditionally used on the forums.

[Palem]

I'd like to confirm that Mystic's +1 mana/tick is not restricted to war...

Also, in the age details page under Faery the extra mana/stealth per tick is worded incorrectly. It says +100% extra stealth/mana per tick, which means faery would be getting 6 mana/stealth per tick, not 4.

[Bishop]

mystic is per tick - i'll ask for the wording to be cleaned up, thanks.

[Sheister]

rofl, no it was worded correctly Bishop. FAery gets +100% each tick. roflmao.

next age please publish that the 24 hr tick OOP will happen.

[Chrystal Palace]

Sheister stop your whining. Is this gonna last all age?