Suicide Squad VS FReakstyle

[pukusam]

i rmbr last time i made a deal which the opponent KD accepted. adhered to the deal but ppl here said that i dealbroke because the deal was **** and cannot be considered a deal and was only agreed upon because we had a gun to their head, i.e notice from 1 side only, if you guys can still remember. we acknowledged it was a **** deal but if it was agreed upon shouldn't it be honoured?

the last time i waved a KD, enemy refuse to come to CF terms, so we waved again and enemy said that we are immoral and we should offer CF up on a plate after we are done with our first wave so as to be moral and after that come to the forums to flame us. Nothing is certain in uto, just a bunch of opinions here and there and people who can find the tiniest of excuses just to wave you and make it sound legit.

i think land drops really should not be allowed in this game. i think it is 1 huge part of the game which is always overlooked. i hope the devs would come up with something to stop this. i.e deletions. the reason is very simple, no 1 will not want a land drop considering it's a win win situation for both sides. thus the only way to stop is for game mechanics to stop it or for the devs to stop it.

Meep: I don't disagree, FS does a number of things that I find distasteful at times.

That said, the effort to GB FS isn't because of distasteful things they've done (like running less than 25 if they've actually done that), it's because they're 'bullying SS by waving them when SS is out of range'. I don't consider waving a kingdom to be inappropriate (though I do frown on bullying, that is not bullying unless it is accompanied by an unwillingness to do diplo for example), and do consider trying to GB a kingdom for waving you just because you couldn't war them to be unacceptable.

The same way that I consider breaking an EOACF just because you feel like you were pushed into making a deal to be unacceptable.

Ultimately, the GB isn't because of mechanics concerns, the GB is because there are people who believe that this specific act is immoral and worthy of a GB. I would disagree with that stance. There are plenty of other things that could be spun into a justification, but that isn't one. To be frank, it seems from my conversations with Mirana that the concern is over making players quit because they're being hit. Again, I feel like the focus is in the wrong place, though I think that is an appropriate focus. If that is the concern, the focus should be on kingdoms that are still running under 25 provs and baiting ghettos into war -- because that's what is most toxic for new players. Not a random hit, and certainly not a wave on another top 5/10 kingdom.

i think people do it because they have a previous vendetta with FS, not because they find what they are doing to SS fair or not. stop trying to justify the GB on SS. just say that those are FS's friends and man up to it. if they are not even FS's friends then i do not know why they are participating in a revenge from ghettoland. maybe FS should just get destroyed this age to put some of the ghettoland kingdoms at ease. doing all this would only make the ghettoland hate you more and you can probably expect a similar situation in future ages when the situation is favourable.