Thats a very lame deflection. Sorry. How can you call it a witch hunt when people have legitimate complaints with logs to back them up? Several times? It seems more like your the clouded one as an ex bb player and member of the fairplay alliance.
How come here you all jumped on the wagon that markers (rightly or wrongly) organised the double where as in the ED case you claim fs did not organise the double? Is silverfox plain out lying, or is this some conspiracy?Originally Posted by Pale
Now thats some admission. For sure seems like it from the outside, and paid for by a kd which it made a 'small' difference to and was just used as a front. Zauper seemed to agree it was a weak punishment and you're as much as stating they had no choice. Again, ed obviously had no choice, they wanted to honour crown and fairplay dominated the server.
Even if we're going to except this is true, I find it hard anyone can believe this makes you (bb) more respoinsbile. I mean, if I told x to hit y's war for example, the question of who's responsible, is more of a question than who's 'more' responsible. Clearly the side that hit in (pyro) by a country mile. Yet they paid zero as with fs who also paid zero.
This is the best part, when a member (leader?) of the bullying alliance does a full u-turn. When the accusers become the accused. When the innocent, become guilty. All in the name of "fairplay."
Reply With Quote