Confirmed.Originally Posted by Korp
Confirmed.
"The Utopian voice of reason" ~Ben (And he's an official moderator)
No, im just trying to figure out what "alliance" wars has to do with this case.
Since I did bring in ~15 retirees to raze CR, you could argue its my province alliance vs CR?
More important is, what do we call ourselves...
TUPAC - The United Provinces Against CR?
Both Tupac and I got razekilled!!
First Godly decides its ok for his kd to attack into wars. Next he calls people multies just because they have more friends than he does.
/me hands Godly a lollipop.
Because it's a very clear case of how more than 2 kingdoms can be at war with each other without being in the war stance.
And you expect me to believe that 15 retirees have the coordination to have identical provinces and attack sequentially, each with a gap of time between attacks. You'd think that they'd all attack at the same time, but it was pretty much 1 guy makes razes, logs off, 1 minute later it's another guy. You've already lied about not hitting us prior to going to war... your credibility is worthless just like you.
It doesn't matter anyways. Now that we're out of war we're just gonna raze off all of your provs and you're going to go back to being irrelevant.
In other words, go back to your moms basement and plot your next scheme.
Edit: Btw who are your retirees? I'm sure they won't mind being named since you're doing "good work" and all?
Last edited by Godly; 20-03-2016 at 21:02.
"Godly, you do realized that you have just sealed your faith now, right?"
Thats not true though, I realize you probably never experinced actual alliance wars but it would still be 2 kingdoms warring eachother while eachothers allies helping them out.
You need another lollipop ?
You dont need to mention them all, just a few would be fine as well.
The outside help is part of the war and it's 1 side vs the other side. Just because it's focused on one or two particular wars doesn't mean it's any less of Kd A and Kd B vs Kd C and Kd D. Those two groups of kingdoms are at war with each other.
How can Kingdom B and D be at war with each other when they aren't attackin? How can CR be at war with Folle when they were only attacking Pandas? If what Folle did was just partake in the war why is that behaviour frowned upon?
It's frowned upon because the community generally thinks that wars should be 1v1. If wars aren't even capable of being something that's not 1v1, then why does the distinction even exist? That's right....because they are capable of being something other than 1v1.
They hadn't hit Folle...yet. That doesn't mean they weren't fighting against him. He was trying to kill their guys, and they were trying to keep their guys alive. Now that their focus isn't required to be exclisvely on Pandas, they will begin hitting Folle, as Godly has said. You're just being daft if you think a war begins as soon as war is declared.
I have to agree with Korp here, the game defines "war" as a stance between 2 kingdoms, each getting certain benefits and drawbacks, such as protection from outside hits and an eowcf period after someone pushes the withdraw button. The game has no such built in definition when it comes to outside parties, so even though they may be coordinating with a kingdom inside the war itself, it cannot be considered an "Alliance War" in the technical sense simply because there is no game mechanic that allows those kingdoms to be within the same war stance as the 2 initial kingdoms. I imagine the term "Alliance War" is simply a slang term to refer to multi-way conflicts, but would not be considered the technical term for such an event, which is what you all are after I believe. "Alliance Conflict" would definitely be more appropriate.
So war didn't exist until stances were introduced?
lolk
When the game mechanics define a term already, you cant make up your own technical definitions based on opinion if you want to have an intelligent discussion, each term has to be clearly defined. What was considered war before the war stance was introduced is irrelevant, once the mechanics of the game clearly define something, all opinions on what that particular thing is are irrelevant, because the ultimate referee of any game are the mechanics they are based on.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote