Actually, Azure, with 9 scientists among 19 people in 24 ticks, you're running below average even if the number is only 2.5%. For a given group of 19 people over that time, there's about a 29.5% chance of getting 9 or less. If it's up at 3%, the probability drops to 12%.
Conversely, 8 scientists gained from Feb 1-9 are on the high end, either way. (The fact that some gained 2, 3, or more doesn't change much, and in fact is quite predictable on a random distribution curve.)
But as to the impact on Persain's assumptions...you're right, the prospect that some of those 'abducted' scientists would have been spawned needs to be borne in mind. The fix was basically 25 ticks in, right? That's likely to have been a few scientists, but more than 10 would be very unlikely, even if it's a 3% spawn rate. (Specifically, about a 13.5% chance of that.) Almost certainly not 20.


Reply With Quote
