Page 20 of 30 FirstFirst ... 101819202122 ... LastLast
Results 286 to 300 of 438

Thread: -wsk- vs CR round 2 ? 3 ?

  1. #286
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,775
    Quote Originally Posted by cRs View Post
    I told topsy we shoupd jusr prep for b2b. We got waved, we offered u CF, u refused and razed into our legit war. End of story.
    You keep coming with silly excuses and now are starting threatening us for next age with same lame move?? Now wtf is this? How in the hell will this ever resolve this as u claim u want to do??
    If you hit us til EOA, why wouldn't I hit you next age?

  2. #287
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    34
    Meep, still havent posted proof.....still looking for it?

  3. #288
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    105
    This is just a reminder for Deep:

    2 questions which were not answered:

    1. From Bob: where is the proof that wsk and CR agreed for what you said they did?:
    2. From me: how in God's name have to managed to lose not one, not two but THREE (3) banks in one war?.

    Thank you in advance, Beep

  4. #289
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Bombadil View Post
    Meep, still havent posted proof.....still looking for it?
    Already have, you must not be looking very hard, I suggest looking harder.

  5. #290
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by Meep View Post
    Already have, you must not be looking very hard, I suggest looking harder.
    Ergo: u dont have any solid proof and just keep trolling here and finding excuses why you lost. I am actually not a bad person and am fully willing to admit it if our leaders wee in the wrong, but the only thing you produce are statements and semi facts. I know the new administration is usa is kinda fond of doing that but I assumed you werent a Trump guy. Seems you are or at least adopt his way of "getting things done"

  6. #291
    I like to post Band of Horses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,990
    Quote Originally Posted by Maximo View Post
    There is no doubting that Meep, but shouldn't some of your rage be placed at the other CR also? Everyone knew what was going on between WSK and CR. They legit waved and stole resources on us prior to our training that we were preparing for you. (another reason for the low NW, and then subsequent rise). You even mentioned that they (clash Royale) were able to fireball our Cows, so what chance would they have had against you? Would you have been willing to let us recover the acres we lost to them, and also punish them together, and then resume our fight? Maybe that would have been the best option for all parties?

    /respect Meep's tenacity in the forums for sure though.
    I am really glad Maximo agreed with my sole point, even if it was in response to meep saying it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lestat View Post
    argumentum ex silentio
    This sent me into a good read, so thank you for that. So it says in an argument from silence the author was intending to give a complete account of the situation, but I believe the author in this situation was deliberately not giving a complete account of the situation to further his agenda. So would that still be Argument ex silentio?



    As for all this talk about razing into wars. Coss has done it, and surely will again in the future, so why are you surprised when someone does it to you? CR doesn't need the DB argument, coss razed into wars when people ran from him. You ran middle of war (according to crs the war isnt over we don't have to pay argument from early on.)
    As for all this talk about cr razing wsk next age. Coss said he'd hunt CR for next age as well. Haven't you even had kingdom names about getting them next age? At least CR is trying to bury the hatchet.

    CR is a hugely hypocritical kd, but the hypocrisy coming from the non Maximo members of WSK is absolutely insane.
    "The Utopian voice of reason" ~Ben (And he's an official moderator)

  7. #292
    Dear Friend Korp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,846
    Quote Originally Posted by Bombadil View Post
    Ergo: u dont have any solid proof and just keep trolling here and finding excuses why you lost. I am actually not a bad person and am fully willing to admit it if our leaders wee in the wrong, but the only thing you produce are statements and semi facts. I know the new administration is usa is kinda fond of doing that but I assumed you werent a Trump guy. Seems you are or at least adopt his way of "getting things done"
    So, cause you are unable to find the needed evidence there is no proof?

  8. #293
    I like to post Band of Horses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,990
    Quote Originally Posted by Meep View Post
    Hey Bazinga.

    How many provs can you sit at once?
    In coss kingdoms it is greater than 1 ;)
    When you've got a prov, plus a prov on proxy you can then take 2 provs to sit and are now running 4 provs. Each proxy gives 2 more provs too. Ever notice how when coss quits kds in the past always 2 provs get deleted? (You can't delete provs you are sitting either.)
    "The Utopian voice of reason" ~Ben (And he's an official moderator)

  9. #294
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    105
    I'm pretty sure the BoH is autistic.

  10. #295
    I like to post
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Utopia
    Posts
    3,932
    Im pretty sure im opportunistic

  11. #296
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    530
    She call me Mr Boombastic
    Josh; leader of a lovable band of misfits, Pinoys, and probable virgins.

    My Raging Clue

    *If a Utopian falls in the woods, and no-one is around to see him...was he still bottom-feeding?

  12. #297
    Moderator for:
    Utopia Forums
    Palem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    22,030
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRealBazinga View Post
    I'm pretty sure the BoH is autistic.
    Let's not

  13. #298
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by Palem View Post
    Let's not
    Autism: a mental condition, present from early childhood, characterized by great difficulty in communicating and forming relationships with other people and in using language and abstract concepts.

    Sorry Boss, it won't happen again.

  14. #299
    Enthusiast Maximo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    473

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Meep View Post
    I'm not playing the victim, I didn't even want to raze you, I'm just strongly suggesting you guys agree to some sort of resolution for this by eoa, or I'm going to consider the matter still open next age, and act accordingly.

    And I'm not speaking for CR in that regard, I'm speaking for me. Not sure what CR is doing next age, I'm just pretty sure what I'm doing.

    That said, I'd be more than happy to resolve this, and then not have to play next age.
    To respond to that with something I saw flogger post. See below:

    Quote Originally Posted by flogger View Post
    My comment to the "well we aren't even playing next age sentiment", usually that doesn't hold up since its one or two guys who don't want to play next age and 80% of the kingdom will end up doing so. Either:

    1) If you're still playing the game now, you're fairly well addicted
    2) Even if you do quit, you end up like a Realest who probably woulda come back at some point by now if he didn't know he had an impending ASF problem on his hands.


    When you're a crowning kd, generally its a pretty bad decision to get into grudge matches over fights that don't mean anything (like this one). Hitting into this war is beyond stupid. Just apologize and move past it. You won the war, being mad enough at the person you just beat for talking to go into razekill mode is beyond retarded. If they're talking like they accomplished something, they did. Both sides shoulda ended that fight happy. One side getting the win, one side saving face in a loss.

    If I were a CR player that actually cares about the top, now's about the time I'd start abandoning my province, since I imagine its just a couple irrational donks calling the shots. CR's reputation built the last 10 ages shouldn't be shat on because of a meaningless 2 vs 3 fight in which they won.
    Meep, I can appreciate you didn't want to raze into war, but it still happened, regardless of the reasoning why. If CR truly want to stop Pew Pew from getting another crown, I would think they would have a much better chance at it without having to worry about razes into war. I for one do not consider the raze issue settled.

    inb4

  15. #300
    Sir Postalot Lestat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Posts
    3,137
    Quote Originally Posted by Band of Horses View Post
    This sent me into a good read, so thank you for that. So it says in an argument from silence the author was intending to give a complete account of the situation, but I believe the author in this situation was deliberately not giving a complete account of the situation to further his agenda. So would that still be Argument ex silentio?.
    I'm not sure I was just trying to sound smart :(

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •