Quote Originally Posted by Goodwitch View Post
well let's say you had trained offense , you could have just retalled and then even punished them for having the audacity to hit you even though you were bigger.
you could have even trained some offense and then later just hit them.
but instead you claim they shouldn't have hit you because you were bigger even though you didn't have offense nor apparently enough defense to defend your land. and so you decided to take them to war...
if they had given you hostile and you declared...no argument from me at all. it happens. but they didn't give you hostile.
if you had no offense and they could break you...why didn't they give you hostile?

do you understand how that does not sound real believable to many?
You are getting on strategical thinking and that's clearly not your strong side. I will not even try to explain you how some things work cause apparently for you only offense and defense at a certain point in time matters;)