Why is it only ok if it encourages wars? Maybe I'm more into growth and, with the recent changes made to prevent banks/cows, agreeing to terms where select provinces go unhit during war is the only way to facilitate what I desire to accomplish. I may very well leave the game if I can't get my bank off the ground...
Perhaps it would be more ethical to push for changes to the mechanics rather than circumventing them with underhanded agreements. We could remove AW/massacre and strengthen MAP(GBP) in warstance so players don't get upset and quit, for example.
Reply With Quote