This Chaps My Bum Hole, Multis Are Allowed Now

[octobrev]

afraid I dont multi, also I can tell you from years of experience fighting the numbers that while you will be able to win a few battles and get great gains, ultimatively you will lose he war because 1 vs 3 even if you are undead and the opponents are not you will still lose more military the longer the conflict drags on compared to each opponent. No build or strategy can prevent that.

Went 1 vs 3 or 4 the first age with Dryads arround, my main target lost like 1/3 of his land dropping below 4k acres after 4-5 days of conflict just before EoA, still I also lost land overall to his kingdom fellors and was not going to be able to stay on 6k acres for long had the age not ended there. I think I was quite a bit over 7k acres when he started attacking me and I retaliated hit for hit. I was Dryad/War hero and was both using pitfalls, bribe gennerals, smite and a good deal of gs and hospitals. The nutcase thought I was obligated to war his 5-6 man kingdom because I used BG and pitfalls on my retal, or he just got it in his head that I would eventually war them if he keept semi suiciding with his Dwarf.

I am forced to disagree! theHERETICS managed a decisive victory over Bring it On with 4 of their friendly kingdoms razing into the war and killing off chained provs, described in this pair of alliancerankings articles: https://pastebin.com/raw/B2Sbj7w7

In addition, Dreams crowned in age 50 after a 1v7 GB conducted by Absalom. I would venture to say that our odds of winning conflicts/ages against multiple opponents are only slightly lower than our odds of winning conflicts/ages under "fair" conditions. Though, I guess it wasn't all that fair as we held the lions share of available talent at the time.

Brute Force triple crowned thanks to a GB from the Honor and Justice alliance (1v10+?). They just absorbed the hits then declared them 1 by 1 from smallest to largest over the next few weeks. And there was no EOWCF at that point to slow them down!