Pretty sure most crowns are won by beeing in the right kingdom, beeing fairly active and picking the right fights, not by beeing ten times better at province mannaging than everyone else, and no province mannaging can make up for getting hit by 5 provinces from 5 diffrent kingdoms over and over.

I tell you I've encountered many players from so called top kingdoms on 1 on 1, most are just rank and file, although the standards might be a bit higher than in most warring kingdoms. Only a few is quite good and can adapt to not beeing protected by a bunch of others and the diffrent situations they might find themself in, many has gotten the impression that they are better than everyone else because they have played in growth kingdoms for a long time. They come across as arrogant and foolish once they join up with a warring kingdom.

It is no coincidence that most top kingdoms disband shortly after loosing their leadership figures, solid leadership and sound strategic decissions are the main reason the majority of the players there can perform better than people in other types of kingdoms, yet the majority of crowns are won by players in those kingdoms.

Multis are not okay and I hope everyone who think it is will end up in the kingdom of Finland once we mannage to turn it into the gulag for cheaters, whiners and arrogant utopia players that it deserves to be.