The whole point is that it isn't obvious, Bishop.Originally Posted by Bishop
There is nothing saying not to do it. There is no clear indication that wars are meant for a certain reason.
How can it be against the rule of "obvious intent" when the intent of war is far from obvious. As it is now, which is the current time in this time-stream, the only thing obvious about war is what it is capable of. The intent is not obvious, and if you'd read my posts it'd be clear that all I want is for it to be.
You can say all you want that it is against the rules, but reading the rules, it is clear it is not against them.
You make the rules, Bishop? That's fine and cool, but keep them updated and clear and concise. All I get from you talking like that is that I can be breaking the rules of Utopia game simply by breathing wrong, metaphorically, since breathing's intent is not clearly defined in the wiki or the rules.
tldr; to break the rules by Bishop's own definition you have to be abusing something beyond its obvious intent. The intentions of most items in game are not clearly defined. Implied is the opposite of obvious, so it's unjust to enforce the rule of obvious intent on implied intent.
Reply With Quote