Quote Originally Posted by citadela01 View Post
You failed to adress my claims, let alone rebuke them.
You claimed you were not offered offered CF after 1 wave, I presented you with offered CF and terms you seemingly agreed to before resorting to GB.

You going on about how we waved you in the first place has no relevance in that argument.
You falling back to same old "we had nothing to do with it" has no relevance to the argument.

You claim innocence, just like you did 2 ages ago.
Personally I gave you benefit of the doubt back than, FS had nothing with you geting deleted, it was Bishop who passed the judgement.

Now we are in similar situation again, this time I dont give you benefit of the doubt.
There has been plenty evidence about your wrongdoings, and part that wasnt made public (and is unknown to me as well) is vouched for by respected neutral parties.
You can put quotation mark on respected part all you like, you will be hard pressed to find more impartial and respected 3rd party. In this community its as good as it gets.

But feel free keep playing dumb. You only strengthen our case.
Now if youll excuse me its nn time for me
If you read carefully I already addressed all your claims but you chose to ignore. We were offered a CF with unrational terms like staying under 85% of FS honor and not able to war anyone you had cfed with which was everyone within our range. Thus we obviously wanted to negotiate between our council and between the leaders of both SS and FS. But FS decides to not wait and wave SS again while CF negotiations are taking place. So is that how you do all your CF deals with weaker kds? Keep pounding them until they beg for you to stop and giving no chance or time to discuss or negotiate?

You are also wrong about the FW thing cause I like most of our members only joined SS or old pharma as you call this age. We had no relations to old pharma or whatever, why should we be help accountable? Now how about you provide some of your concrete evidence as you call instead of saying we organized gb for the 100th time every time you cant seem to win an argument any other way. Like I also said earlier, maybe if you bothered to read up to my reply on your "respected" source, you wouldn't be here repeating yourself.