all i get out of 26 pages is don't use in-game messaging system and you won't get deleted. Sounds like a simple solution.
after all, it's not about "spirit of the game" it's about "fake war"
all i get out of 26 pages is don't use in-game messaging system and you won't get deleted. Sounds like a simple solution.
after all, it's not about "spirit of the game" it's about "fake war"
Ryan knows what he did - just accept it and move on.
∙ Shadowlight ∙ A Mothers Advice ∙ Force ∙ Pansies .
Kingdom Crown Winner with Pansies, Brute Force, Sonata, Dreams
Province Crown Winner with Brute Force
∙ Brute Force ∙ Playboys ∙. Sonata ∙ Dreams ∙ Retired .
+1Originally Posted by Syntico
And in the future remember that war terms where you cannot hit specific provinces under any circumstance = bad idea
Retired at one time but no longer retired.
someone care to summarize these 27 pages?
Ryan got deleted for cheating acording to Bishop (the law) people whine about how unfair it is, Bishop tells them how it is they keep whining.
Yep, I use fluff war terms to get wars.
Lesson learned = do not make war terms that don't restrict or give your KD a negative in any way.
ex. "Our TMs won't hit your TMs. (can't break / not logical anyways)" "We won't send dragons (not in range / could drop into range but not logical)" "I won't hit your monarch (who I can't break anyways / not economically logical to train to do so)"
For those of you who think I'm pulling the above ^ out of my ass then please refer to my prior 2 wars that were based on the same style of bluff/fluff war terms. Heck, there's even a guy in this thread from one of the KD's I was about to war with those terms but his KD scared mine in hostile so we cfed prior to warring.
Poor Ryan - I has a sad for your deletion.
You died to warn the rest of us not to sin...
You are a Martyr...
You can be St. Grande Mucca Ryan the Deleted from now on.
@ i am spartacus,
not exactly what i said, but pretty close, you saw in hostile, that your kd didnt stand up, and at that point you were UB, but would it go to war, 20 active attackers and T/M?s would give you a bad war, since we could?ve made you breakable, without meatshield, this was a lose lose situation for you in your attempts of safetly bottomfeeding us, thus you found another war,....sure this is all assumptions, you intetions could have been other than trying to grow saftley, and i could be wrong, we might have never made you breakable,...but we would have givin it a go, since 20v1 often goes well for the 20.....
Its pretty clear the devs do not want kingdoms having any war terms with other kingdoms. The only confusion is about whether OOW naps between two provs is illegal. If they are legal, then what happens when their two kds happen to go to war with eachother? The nap is vetoed due to war?
"Go back to the gym because you f'king suck at utopia, noob." -Godly
My classic black theme for Utopia - Updated 5/13/15
Greatest strategy thread/question of all-time.
You are wrong in this case, 20v1 often does go well for the 20 but not in this scenario.
I was in Ryans K/D as we were warring. He did say that he and the king were on terms to not attack each other and they didn't. Really everything about the war was as real as it could be.
"Hey, let's have a war, except you and I won't hit each other, but instead farm our ghettos out!"
"Okay, guy. Sounds good."
OH MY GOD! BISHOP YOU TROLLFAG LOLOL! HOW U DELETEZ ME!? I USED MY SITTING AND EVERYTHING!!!!
Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.
Step one: replace everything that works.
Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
Step four: thank you for your patience.
This had nothing to do with warterms.
It's a textbook example of a ghetto farming setup. Two fatties agree not to hit each other, so they can eat acres for a few days, while growing in size and strength. That's a fakewar. It's always been that way.
How can this have been going for 27 pages without you getting it?
Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.
Step one: replace everything that works.
Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
Step four: thank you for your patience.
** opens the door, wades through the waves of testosterone....
Any of you read the link Bishop posted? I did. wow...really illuminating. Lucky to still be playing.
Nothing Ryan did or didn't do makes a difference. Fake war or not, doesn't matter. Wether the language is clear enough, doesn't matter.
Why? Straight from Game Rules:
#1. Account Suspension/Deletion
Your account may be suspended, modified or deleted at any time for any reason, with or without notice to you. In the event of suspension, modification or deletion of your account, you will not be entitled to a refund of any prior amounts that have been paid by you to purchase credits for your account.
the deletions??? 2 deletions? Not really keeping with the spirit of the rules...
#2. Spirit of the Rules
Players attempting to manipulate rules and quirks of the game in ways obviously not intended may be subject to deletion. Because of their nature, these types of circumstances are considered on a case-by-case basis.
Welcome back Ryan (winks)
Last edited by Spookylou; 14-02-2012 at 05:30.
It's clearly out of context.
I was deleted for making bluff war terms. (For those of you who think that's BS, my prior 2 wars were based comparable bogus terms in relation to dragons)
As a heads up to the rest of you. Don't make any war terms that don't negatively impact / restrain your KD.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote