Wow was that sarcasm?Originally Posted by Palem
What A/m is gonna run 1WPA raw? I was at least trying to give respectable figures bassed on what i've seen recently, my point is that altho A/m will run a better WPA than A/t and pure attackers, it generally wont be higher than a Faes. Putting a TM at only 20% more raw WPA is underestimating good TMs IMO, even at that underestimate the Fae still beats the Elf in magic, admittingly just about. I've not taken Sci into consideration and how A/m channeling sci will dilute with growth during a war along with WPA, leaving Faes to rein supreme in magic. How about how Faes have horded honour and able to keep it better as they're not trading hits, as such that the honor bonuses can be relyed upon slightly more. As a pure attacker I have gone from Count to Baran and back up to Viscount in 24 hours, I've not seen a Fae do that, that is because they have more consistancy in the honor area, more consistancy allows for it to be relyed upon. They don't send out troops and lower there def from that, they don't have the same worries as attackers.
