It has to do with whether robberies are accepted and acceptable or not. It has to do with whether Sanc initiated or if you initiated. Elit has said that he considers robbing to be a hostile act, that Sanc initiated hostilities. By that argument, by targetsharing Havoc, you got a number of different kds to hostile them. That's not twisting words.
There's no evidence either way, I didn't say that there was. But not offering them a CF did allow them to rob 100M gc from you.Also MA didn't offer cf but Sanctuary didn't as well. Is it double standard? We didnt offer cf=we planned to wave them, but they didnt offer cf is not equal to they planned to double us?
I aint never heared o nothin', cuz it ain't a word :). Sure, you could go into fortified, but you would have spent most of your cash reserves on exploring, and thus not been as trained up.Can you explain the difference? And since when coming oow with a 100% sure incoming war in 48 hours and full of gold is saying "we wont war u!". Have you heared of fortified? Maybe explore and train in 48 hours? Is that so hard for you to grasp as a possibility?
Would your ~130 nwa calves have been substantially more pumped? I doubt it...- as for the preparation and gold. Not sure how you prepare for wars. But on that land level exploring is not just for the sake of exploration but also to prepare for war.
Because Sanc can't hit your calves, which gives you time to secure them in a world in which Havoc isn't hitting you? Do you not think that that would be a huge advantage, as opposed to fighting a Havoc that can hit your calves?- and how exactly it is safe to explore+prepare for Havoc when we are hostile with Sanctuary? By losing couple of hundred millions? By losing army hitting them? By staying in aggressive instead of fortified for 2 days?
edit: Korp, didn't they sit and watch while you stole their gold? Should they have broken CF and immediately waved Elit for targetsharing their 0 thief cow?