Proposal to end he Awar

[SlightlyOverdosed]

So does this mean that BB. the offended party did not have any chance to handle this 1 on 1 and thats why went asking all the kd's to help them GB us for 300-400 razed acres and that too not by us?
I

No, this means that given Emerity themselves didn't see a point in actioning Pyro last age, after the war. Plus Emerity has chosen not to ask for assistance, there was no reason for BB to interfere.

The fact that Emerity chose not ask for further actioning last age, and have not asked for aid does not mean No one can ever choose to ask for help actioning a transgressor.

Emerity last age made a choice. Doesn't mean that it has now became law to do the same.

[Judge]

You need to take a deep breath and think about what I said about the person pulling the switch on the electric chair, he kills a man yet is not prosecuted for that act.

Here the question is are all the 10 deaths caused by the person pulling the switch? Answer is yes! So punishment to all the 10 should be the same!

[Palem]

You know better than me who the members of the KD in question are. Look for your answer there. This thread already covers a lot of this.

K. Just confirming that Emeriti was getting gangbanged for something other kingdoms did.

[Judge]

No, this means that given Emerity themselves didn't see a point in actioning Pyro last age, after the war. Plus Emerity has chosen not to ask for assistance, there was no reason for BB to interfere.

The fact that Emerity chose not ask for further actioning last age, and have not asked for aid does not mean No one can ever choose to ask for help actioning a transgressor.

Emerity last age made a choice. Doesn't mean that it has now became law to do the same.

Exactly my point! We had the guts to win against our opponents and BB actually didnt! The damage in both the instances cannot be counted but atleast we didnt have to GB them to show our supremacy!

[MyNameIsMatija]

K. Just confirming that Emeriti was getting gangbanged for something other kingdoms did.

For what they told their friend in another KD to do, yes. The severity of their punishment was determined by their bad reputation.

[SlightlyOverdosed]

Exactly my point! We had the guts to win against our opponents and BB actually didnt! The damage in both the instances cannot be counted but atleast we didnt have to GB them to show our supremacy!

So your official stance is that if I am stronger than you then I can **** you over however I like, and since you can't beat me in 1v1 you are not allowed to do anything?

lol

[Felonious]

For what they told their friend in another KD to do, yes. The severity of their punishment was determined by their bad reputation.

So you're a proponent of Draconian law and guilt or innocence based on public opinion, good to know...

(most of the rhetoric that you've clearly been swayed by is against a phantom btw)

[flogger]

The Law also states that the punishment is same for all offenders.. So why did flogger state on top that it will not be possible for their side to abide to it?

They want to set a particular thing and they themself dont wanna follow it?

Your signature indicates you fought in 5 awars and won them, did you raze down after those wins?

[Judge]

So your official stance is that if I am stronger than you then I can **** you over however I like, and since you can't beat me in 1v1 you are not allowed to do anything?

lol

Well no, My Stance is that for a petite reason where things can be resolved, i dont force a GB!

[Judge]

Your signature indicates you fought in 5 awars and won them, did you raze down after those wins?

You answer my questions first and then I will make sure I will answer yours!

[Judge]

Your signature indicates you fought in 5 awars and won them, did you raze down after those wins?

Also here the question is not abt razing or anything in previous awars.

You started this GB cos you wanted to set a precedent that No kd ever hits in eowcf!! So you want to punish us! We accept all the punishment but it should be the same to the other kds too!

[MyNameIsMatija]

So you're a proponent of Draconian law and guilt or innocence based on public opinion, good to know...

(most of the rhetoric that you've clearly been swayed by is against a phantom btw)

What else do you want in a game like Utopia? Forensic evidence? There are logs of the act actually if you want to nitpick that much.
I'm going to pull out of this discussion now, mostly because I don't care about the issue anymore. I have made up my mind on the matter and illogical arguments will not change it, neither will my posts change yours.

[citadela01]

Exactly my point! We had the guts to win against our opponents and BB actually didnt! The damage in both the instances cannot be counted but atleast we didnt have to GB them to show our supremacy!

Beating somebody 1v1 after that somebody ****played you previous to upcoming conflict is not a punishment, its is incentive to repeat the transgression next time.

There has to be some form of punishment that goes beyond what would normally be experienced (in this case that would be 1v1 conflict).
Even if you were to completely anihilate theoretical transgressor in theoretical 1v1 conflict that is not worse than what would happen to him if he didnt secure unfair advantage with said ****play.
Quite the contrary its reasonable to assume conflict would pan out even worse for him is unfair advantage wasnt obtained.

Outcome of the 1v1 counflict would be completelly irrelevant, it would still serve as incentive to repeat ****play next time.

[Judge]

Beating somebody 1v1 after that somebody ****played you previous to upcoming conflict is not a punishment, its is incentive to repeat the transgression next time.

There has to be some form of punishment that goes beyond what would normally be experienced (in this case that would be 1v1 conflict).
Even if you were to completely anihilate theoretical transgressor in theoretical 1v1 conflict that is not worse than what would happen to him if he didnt secure unfair advantage with said ****play.
Quite the contrary its reasonable to assume conflict would pan out even worse for him is unfair advantage wasnt obtained.

Outcome of the 1v1 counflict would be completelly irrelevant, it would still serve as incentive to repeat ****play next time.

We thought they will learn not to cheat :( But they didnt!! They again were caught doing it this age!!

[Felonious]

What else do you want in a game like Utopia? Forensic evidence? There are logs of the act actually if you want to nitpick that much.
I'm going to pull out of this discussion now, mostly because I don't care about the issue anymore. I have made up my mind on the matter and illogical arguments will not change it, neither will my posts change yours.

Hey bud, you're the one who wanted to play lawyer. But I dont blame you for wanting to bow out. It was a terribad argument ;)

(btw, there's mountains of evidence that BB's main ally is dirty to the core. Seems they dont mind turning a blind eye to all that though. Odd...)