Quote Originally Posted by silverfox View Post
Justification is just a persons opinion, FS feel they were allowed to smack people about and take their honour, other KDs feel that it wasn't acceptable and in their view it was bullying.

My own opinion doesn't really matter, I can see both sides views and they're both equally valid arguments. "With risk comes reward" is utopias tagline, FS took the risk of angering people leveraged against the honour gained, as you said things must be within reason and the KDs being hit feel this was unreasonable so have acted to police the game.

It could be endlessly debated about what is right and wrong, about game mechanics which are good and bad for the game, but what it comes down to is how people feel and there is often very little you can do to make someone who feels like they've been treat unfairly change their mind on the situation.
You could also just answer his question :p
If you think the GB is justified, then a GB on ED last age would have been fine as well since they did the same thing.

It's a food chain and whoever isn't strong enough to defend their resource, simply risks losing it to a stronger kingdom. Last age ED was the "bully", this age that's FS. Next age it's ???