Suicide Squad VS FReakstyle

[Nightmare_]

also...FS could just give a summary of chain of events. I did suggest those interested should hear all sides.
Instead you go and hang out your bully attitude again.
You had and still have every opportunity to show that you are not bullies. But alas you insist on proving you are.

I scoff at you. Does that make me a bully

[StratOcastle]

Because this seems to have gone unnoticed for so long, and it was such an accurate character witness about Goodwitch, I'm bringing this post back up. Such tenacity on a witch hunt for FS by someone who was "wronged."

Your argument is in defense of aggressive action. When you attack someone first you need to understand that the reaction is up to the recipient. What, are we going to start measuring appropriate retaliation? Well, they already have.

I'm well aware of mechanical leverage, and you assume this advantage means diplo should go smoothly as the smaller kingdom should lay down. That's exactly opposite to my reaction to aggressive insurgence. And like I said, it's not anger and it certainly isn't fear. For my part and many others we embrace challenge.

You're questioning the character of the player on the receiving end of a slew of FS advocates. Your statement condemns kingdoms/players that defend themselves.

Goodwitch was wronged because FS started it. SS was wronged because FS started it. It's that simple.

[StratOcastle]

I scoff at you. Does that make me a bully

It's a disrespectful act as google definitions indicate and therefore bullying, lol. So the answer is yes.

Merry Christmas Nightmare_


1. to speak derisively; mock; jeer

[Goodwitch]

I scoff at you. Does that make me a bully

nope. Claiming you are right no matter what because what you claim to be the majority of the server agrees with you while it is in actuality a tiny fraction of the server does.
Claiming that might makes right does.
Consistently hitting tiny kingdoms not even involved in the crown fights claiming it is your only choice while refusing wars on level ground does.
Hitting kingdoms a fraction of your size and then claiming they are dodging you does.

I have said it and will say it again, this is not a personal attack against the players of FS. I think FS has great players and they are well capable fighting challenging wars.
This is a select few that believe they rule the world and can bully anyone that questions them into submission. Among those is FS' leadership.
This is about measuring right and wrong on a different scale for some.

[dizzysky]

Your argument is in defense of aggressive action. When you attack someone first you need to understand that the reaction is up to the recipient. What, are we going to start measuring appropriate retaliation? Well, they already have.

I'm well aware of mechanical leverage, and you assume this advantage means diplo should go smoothly as the smaller kingdom should lay down. That's exactly opposite to my reaction to aggressive insurgence. And like I said, it's not anger and it certainly isn't fear. For my part and many others we embrace challenge.

You're questioning the character of the player on the receiving end of a slew of FS advocates. Your statement condemns kingdoms/players that defend themselves.

Goodwitch was wronged because FS started it. SS was wronged because FS started it. It's that simple.

i agree with this 100% 2 kds who worked to a crown hard all age..one decides they want it more cuz they worked 'harder' and decides to force the others hand to give it to them instead of winning it fair and square. you bullied a kd who potentially worked just as hard as you did..and didnt stand a chance in there current state. people in server see this and decide that this bullying is unwarrented so stand up to the bullies. now..fs calls in the alliance to bully those standing up for there moral rights..and now bullies them into saying ss cant compete for crown anymore and tells others to screw off...when in the start it was FS getting greedy and playing the part of the bully cuz tehy wanted it more so it was right to bully them to win it. gj fs on showing how good you are...as well as your 'alliance' that apparently says bullying is alright..since you support fs and now are bullying yourself. this game is just downright screwed. sounds like highschool all over again

[Nightmare_]

It's a disrespectful act as google definitions indicate and therefore bullying, lol. So the answer is yes.

Merry Christmas Nightmare_


1. to speak derisively; mock; jeer

Then I am guilty of being the playground bully. Crucify me :D

Merry Christmas

[dizzysky]

ah well what do i know. all people i used to respect and like are part of the side that knows its bullying but keeps trying to justify themselves. same old game, same old bullsheet. games dying..game is fcked. dont think ill be returning next age. that is for sure

[fawk]

Thanks Goodwitch.

So my question is, why did FS start waving SS in the first case?
From what i understand they had CF. Besides that SS already warred FS and lost. And on top of that, from what i understand, SS was too small to war FS anyways before the wave even started.

Were FS waving SS to deny them honor crown? Or just to get some free honor for their own guys?
If they broke CF for that, that's pretty freaking lame.

If FS had a valid reason to start waving SS, what was it?

[Palem]

Thanks Goodwitch.

So my question is, why did FS start waving SS in the first case?
From what i understand they had CF. Besides that SS already warred FS and lost. And on top of that, from what i understand, SS was too small to war FS anyways before the wave even started.

Were FS waving SS to deny them honor crown? Or just to get some free honor for their own guys?
If they broke CF for that, that's pretty freaking lame.

If FS had a valid reason to start waving SS, what was it?

This what I've gathered:

-FS was #1 honor, SS was #2 honor. FS was ahead by about 3k.
-FS had a standing CF with SS, but no terms on it, meaning they were free to break it whenever they want.
-SS were planning on getting another war, which if they would have won, would have most certainly put them ahead of FS for honor.


I see nothing lame/wrong about FS actively working to secure their crown. They didn't break any deals. They didn't wave some scrub kingdom with nothing to offer just to be a bunch of jerks. It was #1 waving #2. Everything else is QQ.

[Lamme]

I already know my province name for next age. Bully, best word eu.

[Goodwitch]

This what I've gathered:

-FS was #1 honor, SS was #2 honor. FS was ahead by about 3k.
-FS had a standing CF with SS, but no terms on it, meaning they were free to break it whenever they want.
-SS were planning on getting another war, which if they would have won, would have most certainly put them ahead of FS for honor.


I see nothing lame/wrong about FS actively working to secure their crown. They didn't break any deals. They didn't wave some scrub kingdom with nothing to offer just to be a bunch of jerks. It was #1 waving #2. Everything else is QQ.

only maybe if you put it into context of them refusing to war the kingdom ss was going to war. and refusing offers to fight ss on level ground.

so hypothetical scenerio because I am sure they are all CFed..but... if say The U wave FS right out of EOWCF now(justification that there are provinces in range they can gain acres from)...would FS going to smile and take it or would they complain that it is unfair ? Would their allies leave it at a 1 vs 1 or would they intervene?

[Lamme]

only maybe if you put it into context of them refusing to war the kingdom ss was going to war. and refusing offers to fight ss on level ground.

so hypothetical scenerio because I am sure they are all CFed..but... if say The U wave FS right out of EOWCF now(justification that there are provinces in range they can gain acres from)...would FS going to smile and take it or would they complain that it is unfair ? Would their allies leave it at a 1 vs 1 or would they intervene?

They would call Trump to make them great again. You should try!

[citadela01]

This what I've gathered:

-FS was #1 honor, SS was #2 honor. FS was ahead by about 3k.
-FS had a standing CF with SS, but no terms on it, meaning they were free to break it whenever they want.
-SS were planning on getting another war, which if they would have won, would have most certainly put them ahead of FS for honor.


I see nothing lame/wrong about FS actively working to secure their crown. They didn't break any deals. They didn't wave some scrub kingdom with nothing to offer just to be a bunch of jerks. It was #1 waving #2. Everything else is QQ.

This^^

After that 3 KD's started razing FS in war one of which broke EOA cf we had.
Basically we got gb'ed cause we played hardball.
Drama stems from the fact kd's who decided to help us are razing SS, who in return claims they had nothing to do with GB and outsiders acted on their own accord.

[Goodwitch]

2) Spectre waved FS 1/4 into the age. FS had a different warring target in the "person" of a 1-2 mils lower nw Kd than both Spectre and FS. You can understand however what 1-2 mils nw means 1/4 from start of age.

this was posted just a few minutes ago in another forum thread.

totally isolated incident or pattern of bullying and avoiding real wars? What exactly did that smaller kingdom have that Spectre didn't in that scenerio?

[citadela01]

this was posted just a few minutes ago in another forum thread.

totally isolated incident or pattern of bullying and avoiding real wars? What exactly did that smaller kingdom have that Spectre didn't in that scenerio?

Spectre never waved FS, you seriously need to **** off with your lies.