-wSk- vs CR

[Meep]

Wsk had the best setup / start out of anyone early age and had they really wanted to be aholes to everyone, they would be best positioned to win the age. However, they're still in it (thanks to you) and may win still. We did wave them, they got the WW and fight was acre neutral for both kds, they got the WW bonus acres and we got the hostile / war acres and both kds ended +5k. Funny how you threw that at me, doesn't really do anything.

That's actually the exact response I was looking for, thanks for obliging. Is it still us farming out if they gain in war and we get the WW bonus?

It might even be a shame if both KDs gained and then fought again!

You guys were the ones who decided to "try" this age to stop us from 3 peat. And you Meep were the one who talked to us and told us you were going to farm WSK and were asking us if we regret not giving you a free extension. Do you remember that? Well here's me telling you failed and you're not good. Your council players think super highly of themselves but haven't achieved anything and haven't really even been able to lead a kd until majority of the server quit.

As much as I like coss and consider him a friend, yes I would have preferred for you to win so I can enjoy the pleasure of farming you after war and telling you you're not crowning baby but I guess I'll just have to enjoy this instead. You guys are no where we good as you think you are. Hopefully after this age you will check your ego and stop asking people for 20% of their acres or 1.25x competitor acres to cf.

You guys are good at growth in vacuum and taxing people who can't fight back but when you you go head to head against a top leadership team on close to even land, you lose.

Let me know if you want more.

You're apparently still missing the part where at no point in my entire time playing Utopia have I ever cared even the slightest bit about a crown of any sort.

I like wars, big wars even, big relatively balanced wars come rarely.