Game Needs More Good kds Competing

[Persain]

you can whore with any setup ... the secret is *censored*

I know the "secret" i have crowns as players and leaders between wol, bf and genesis as well as one of the best WW records in the game with my current kd. Palem makes it sound though that the WW kds are missing something and it was implied that my kd has made mistakes/bad picks based on our position. My argument is quit complaining there's no completion, heck we've been #4 alot of thier age and i specifically told my kd we wont be trying to crown and have made moves to back that up. Either suggest a "fix" what u think is wrong or organize a group of people in game to make the top more interesting. Palem your not skilled enough to do organization and the "Fix" suggestions would kil the game. So either start complaining u think there needs to be more "top" kds or do something about it but its useless to backhandedly insult "war" kds by telling them they suck.

edit so no double post

You're using BiO as a case study...

he ment pulse...thats a clear mistype.

I could be mistaken, but wasn't Monument in Sanctuary's path of destruction after they got beat down by GT58 early and ended finishing #2 pretty much through warring alone? They seemed to do ok warring YOU in YOUR environment.

No one is saying abs/hoh/pulse are BAD kds, almost all war kds lose at some point doesnt mean "competing" for the top is the right direction for monument to go to "prove" the are good, anyone whose wars them (we have and beat them) could tell you they are a decent kd and given the right starting point could very much compete even if they'd lose.

Edit:
@Persain - This is nothing like world of warcraft. Everything on utopia is connected, not so much in WoW. You want honor? You need to war. You want to crown? You'll need to war. You want to win wars? You may need to engage in a war or two. As far as your race setup and competeting. You have 1 more war win than Rage and you are 62% of their size.

again diplomacy and whoring Choices...or "mistakes" if u will. Would anyone say we made the right call for a whoring kd to drop from 17 million to 9 million nw to war brainstorm. Had we made different choices and our bottom 4-5 been only slightly better it'd be completely different, but then again u can argue we suck as much as u want its not a big deal to me. just remember things arent gonna change unless there a leader to lead it or a game mechanic to change it. Game change would be bad, and calling the people u want to lead it bad isnt the right way to get someone to step up.