Quote Originally Posted by silverfox View Post
Sorry Nesta but right now you're coming over as either naive at best or fairly clueless at worst.

You've said that you didn't know the situation and had to ask about it while in a hurry, but by that point you'd already managed to either have decided off your own back that ED was "powerplaying" FS or you'd been asked by a 3rd party (FS/BB/??) to help and based on what you knew of the situation (sounds very little) then decided that request was valid.

.........................

To me it sounds like you're trying to implicate Pyro as being at fault and you made that call to go after ED. However your lack of knowledge around the situation and needing to ask questions about what was going on, combined with the way the convos are worded makes it very much seem like this wasn't just Pyro noticing something happened and making a move to stop it. Rather now it looks like you're trying to take blame and cover tracks (maybe that's not true but that's how I personally read it and I have no vested interest in trying to make any parties look worse than others).
I did not claim to know nothing before waving. Where'd you get that from? If by lacking "full facts and knowledge" you are referring to lack of full knowledge of happenings prior to this age, then perhaps I'm guilty.

I was aware what the CF offer was on the table, and that was crucial towards affecting the decision, since I've stated I felt it was a very unreasonable offer and I myself have just been recipient of a very unfair offer (in my opinion).

Then I was presented another opinion/perspective while talking to Parth, to which I asked for quick clarifications whether my interpretations were mistaken, without having to scroll back pages on a phone while waiting to board a plane. I even showed parth and dUK my check-in luggage and boarding pass if you're nitpicking for consistency.

I'm sorry my English standard isnt quite up to par to be able to gather those inferences you've made by reading between the lines of diplo and piecing contextual information together, because I'm still not seeing them after having read what I've posted a second and then third time. I can't see what I have contradicted myself with, nor can I see an attempt to hide anything nor direct blame to one party (in this case you're claiming I'm directing blame to myself, or did I misread/misunderstand again. lol?).

Everything seems pretty consistent as far as I'm concerned.