I invite you to join your nation's Intelligence corps. You might learn to assess risks. Attacking Hamas is not a walk in the park as you try to present it.
We are not looking for glory, we're looking for safety and to live without terror.
So because Hamas doesn't have good ground forces it's legitimate for them to use artillery fire, but because Israel has good ground forces it's not legitimate for it to use artillery and air strikes?
If Israel didn't have a ground force, would you say that the air strikes are OK?
Sadly, these are the minimal losses. If Hamas took care of its people, you would see a lot less casualties for sure.
The fact that you say that the territory given to Israel by the UN is actually Palestinian doesn't make Israeli civilians sacrifice themselves. They just want to live their lives in safety.
Yes you do. You condone the killing of civilians on the Palestinian side, but on the other hand say it's fine for Hamas to target and kill Israeli civilians.
Hamas knows exactly where the civilians are trying to hide. Instead of going away from these places, to keep the civilians safe, they go as near as possible to these locations and use the civilians as human shields. They fire mortar shells on Israeli forces. The Israeli ground forces return fire to the source and then you blame them for the death of the civilians.
As I said before, the civilians in the Gaza strips are victims of Hamas. If Hamas cared about its people it wouldn't have used the civilians as human shields.