Yet to the rest of the server it displays that the kingdom is at war with X:X. So the kingdom is treated with respect to the rest of the server as still being in conflict. Does your subjective view of this now hold more weight that the express game mechanics?Originally Posted by AquaSeaFoam
OH! So you are saying that what Bour did is a permissable vulture according to Age 28 codes of conduct..... So we are going back to age 28 now? I eagerly await the thousands of players that are going to join. Or have we evolved beyond this point through several ages where: 1)the game is nothing like that and it is generally accepted that you don't hit into EoWCF's; 2) Emeriti's conduct in encouraging the practice is still wrong; 3) Bour did not have any justification; 4) and this four hour window and messaging to non-diplomacy engaged core members is a smokescreen of burning feces?Post war is a recovery period to minimize damage from getting vultured. Before there was post war, kingdoms would often get waved the hour they left a live war by "vultures". For example, this was Brute force's normal tactic when they were on the battlefields (main) server. They would wait for Rage to exit a war with no post war protection and then immediately wave them and force a cf. You can bet that Rage didn't like those tactics of vulturing to force a cf, but it was considered a cowardly but valid way to play and there was never any issue made of it despite them doing it 3 separate times to Rage alone that I remember (and Rage never having done it to them.)
