Originally Posted by
Proteus
Last age there was a coordinated alliance of RPP that put AMA through the ringer of B2B wars, BB wasnt in crown race since early age, we were playing 1vs4, thats the difference. Although you were not formally in an "alliance" you benefitted from a de facto nap for 10 weeks with 3 of those kds. 2 kds having friendly relations does a lot less harm to the game than 3 kingdoms being allied and coordinating to one kingdom. This age you had your failed FPP butt busy fake-rage who mirrored you perfectly and you both decided to cheat and abuse game mechanics and ultimately were ***** slapped by bishop.
Also why is PS's post bs, every time someone questions your inflated self worth based on performance you call it bs, it's based on charts.
Age 58 your kd finished outside of t10 and lost war to ama
Age 59 your kd lost b2b fights war to bb and finished #7
Age 60 won
Age 61 wont win, probably wont finish t3 (we can see later).
How are these results consistent/good? Are these "top kd" results? Being a top kd is all about consistent performance in charts and war vs other top kds, its not about hitting a home run one age after having mediocre performance in others. Right now the game is even smaller making it easier it to be t3 consistently.
So whats up?