Quote Originally Posted by Maximouse View Post
Probably hard to believe but I voted NO on the poll. I dont think BB and AMA are ruining the game. I do think that their alliance, or friendly relations or whatever they will call it now is bad for the game. As they said themselves, they are 2 of the 3 best kd's left in the game. Who actualy made a pact to deal with the 3rd KD.
Is there a realistic chance for real competition in that scenario? Only if CR goes for NW/acres full force, or if other KD's improve their line up, or knowledge, or activety, or a combination of those 3.

Last age Darkie (1 of the leaders in BB) and I talked a bit about how the top functions and we both believe that the top is way too narrow for alliances. Last age it was pyro/pew2/rbl and ama complained. This age its ama/bb working together from the looks of it while the other kd's dont. Still waiting on AMA to complain this age. Or is it only unfair when its against AMA?
Our friendship just goes back a bunch of ages, from a time where Absalom still existed.
How is the 2v1 as you see it any different from the 4v2 or even 4v1? Like age 55, we were solo against Mercy, Sanc, HoH and Rage. We had neutral relations with HoH as flogger and ravenant knew each other well, but we had to fight the other 3.

When this age started, you guys where probably friendly with Rage. And you had a CF acquired with pewpew. We had a CF with each other.

Last age, everyone CFed each other but refused to CF AMA/BB. (altho CR had a CF with AMA, nobody else did)
Situations like that just make the bond stronger. When Absalom got GBed, it usually got stronger.

An age lasts say 3 months. Every 3 months it starts all over and others get in control.

ps. this just seems some big troll from Sheister... just can't believe he's serious ;p