I consider beating you in Age 51, there is no way you can really argue otherwise. You got the drop on us this age after war, we did not have time to train up properly to have a good fight so you got a wave for it.
In Age 51 you were the one who noticed and both sides had ample time to train, there was prolonged exchange of hits and Rage took a lot of acres from both kingdoms in spite of 1v2, inspite of FW, etc so if you dont think I can consider proving as we were better than you that age you have some issues.
How is it embracing myself to merely mention something that happened. If one kd fights another and gains land from them in that fight, is saying "We gained X land embracing yourself? Just because AMA beat Sanc does not mean they would beat Havoc those two things are not correlated. Half of the reason for sanc losing was not knowing about the lack of the fort tpa penalty - Havoc knew about that from watching what happened to sanc and would not fall prey to the same move.